TradeView - A Kentucky World Trade Center Publication
Volume 17 Number 3
Summer 2006
Back to TradeView

 

Member News

Member Highlight: Fifth Third Bank, Mark Klein, International Banking Specialist & Assistant VP
Sister Cities of Louisville Welcomes New Executive Director, Elizabeth Kuhn

Expeditors Newsflash - Asia Edition: South Asian Free Trade Area Launched in July
Dean Dorton & Ford's Exporters' Tax Update
Lexmark Introduces New Printer Lines
Expeditors Newsflash - U.S.-Bahrain FTA Implemented; Recent Customs Quota Book Transmittals


Member Highlight:
Fifth Third Bank, Mark Klein, International Banking Specialist & Assistant VP

www.53.com

Mark Klein has been a board member of the Kentucky World Trade Center since 2002 and has worked closely with the KWTC since 2000. Mark Serves on the "Education" sub-committee and is currently working to develop an on-line trade certification program for KWTC members. Mark has worked in the banking industry for 17 years and has focused on International Banking for the past 6. Mark has been with Fifth Third Bank for 4 years and currently manages their International Banking division in Louisville, KY. Mark manages a portfolio of customers including some large, multi-national companies, as well as, smaller companies with less than 10 employees. No company is too big or too small.

Fifth Third Bank offers a complete line of services to meet any company's international banking needs. These services include, but are not limited to, foreign exchange, letters of credit, export financing and international wires and drafts. Fifth Third's corporate foreign exchange services can be accessed by either telephone or Internet. Fifth Third has one of the largest trading desks in the Midwest and its foreign exchange advisors can help companies develop a strategy to protect them from the risks associated with currency fluctuations. These constant changes in the foreign exchange markets result in both risks and opportunities when dealing internationally. For the international travelers, Fifth Third Bank also offers foreign currency exchange services at its main office and airport banking centers. Fifth Third Bank is a previous winner of the Kentucky World Trade Center's World Trade Success Award.

Mark graduated from the University of Louisville in 1988 with a BSBA (Finance Major) and earned his MBA in 1997, also from U of L. In addition to his board service with the KWTC, Mark serves on the board of Junior Achievement and the Crane House. Mark is a "born and raised" Louisville boy and resides in the Highlands area of Louisville with his wife and 2 daughters. If chasing 3 women around was not enough, Mark has 3 dogs, 3 cats and 2 birds. Mark loves to golf and is very involved with his daughters' numerous sports activities.

top


Sister Cities of Louisville Welcomes New Executive Director, Elizabeth Kuhn
www.sclou.org

Elizabeth Kuhn was born and raised in Louisville, Kentucky. She completed her undergraduate studies with a BA in Hispanic Studies from Lewis and Clark College in Portland, OR. While at Lewis and Clark she completed two semesters abroad in Cuenca, Ecuador and Santiago, Dominican Republic. She traveled extensively before and through her college years to Europe, South America, Asia, Australia and New Zealand. After completing her BA she moved back to Louisville, where she worked for 3 years as a caseworker for Cuban immigrants with Kentucky Refugee Ministries. She returned to school in 2004 to complete her Masters of Arts in Spanish through Middlebury College in Middlebury Vermont. The program was a full year with 2 semesters in Madrid, Spain. Upon her return to Louisville, she began working for the National Center for Family Literacy in the Hispanic Family Learning Institute. In July of 2006 she accepted the position of Executive Director at Sister Cities of Louisville and is excited to be working for such a wonderful organization.

top


Expeditors Newsflash-Asia Edition: South Asian Free Trade Area Launched in July
www.expeditors.com

Gulf Times reported on 2 July 2006 that the South Asia Free Trade Agreement
(SAFTA) took effect on July 1, 2006 among seven member countries of South
Asia.  The aim of the agreement is to enhance intra-regional trade and
economic cooperation. Under the SAFTA roadmap, there is very great potential
for intra-regional trade to climb from the current $5-6 billion to $18 billion
in five years.

The seven nations who participated in SAFTA - formed an alliance called South
Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) - includes Bangladesh,
Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.  Under the new regime,
the most developed of these countries - Pakistan, India and Sri Lanka - will
virtually eliminate tariffs with the other countries by 2013.

Countries that have been given the status of "least developed countries" like
Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and Maldives within the SAARC, will reduce their
customs duties to 30 percent by the end of 2007, and ranging from 0 percent to
5 percent by the end of 2015.

Any existing trade barriers would be reviewed from time to time and steps
would be taken to remove them through bilateral and regional negotiations.

The member-states have decided to notify non-tariff measures (NTMs) and
para-tariff measures (PTMs) facing their exports to other SAARC states by
October 1, 2006.

top


Dean Dorton & Ford's Exporters' Tax Update
By Leigh McKee & Jen Shah, Shareholders with Dean, Dorton & Ford, PSC
www.ddfky.com

Summary

The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 provides for a phase out of the extraterritorial income (ETI) exclusion with 80% of the ETI exclusion available for 2005 and 60% of the exclusion available for 2006. The ETI exclusion is replaced with a phased-in deduction (QPD) for certain qualified domestic production activities available for all qualified production, regardless of whether or not the property is exported.

The phase-out of the ETI is the result of a long and protracted trade dispute between the US and the EU. It is replaced with a deduction available for qualified US production (QPD). The QPD is designed to put exporters on basically the same after-tax financial footing as the ETI, but is available for qualified domestic production - regardless of where the goods are sold.

Privately-held U.S. exporters who continue to be eligible for the ETI during the phase-out period need to determine whether the ETI regime or an IC-DISC would provide better after-tax results. For privately-held exporters, the IC-DISC results in a portion of the company's export-related profits being taxed at 15% vs. up to 35% - a permanent tax savings of 20%. This result is due to the current taxation of dividends to individuals or fiduciaries at just 15% (currently enacted through 2008).

To qualify for 2006 benefits, these exporters need to establish their IC-DISCs and make the IC-DISC election as soon as possible.

Overview

In part due to the worldwide scope of its taxation of U.S. citizens and residents, the U.S. has long provided certain domestic producers with tax incentives for exporting goods. The policy goal behind these incentives has been to encourage production in the U.S., creating jobs, economic spin-off benefits, thus expanding the domestic tax base, and generally putting U.S. exporters on equal competitive footing with exporters from other countries which do not tax the worldwide income of their citizens and residents.

These incentives began nearly thirty-five years ago in 1971 with the adoption of the DISC and continue through today with the adoption of the qualified production deduction and with current discussions in Congress of adopting a territorially based system of taxation.

To the EU's credit, the US system of exclusions described below have provided a prohibited export subsidy, but only because they provide for a deferral or exclusion from taxable income (a direct tax) based on exports. The EU countries provide for a rebate from the VAT (value-added tax) for exports from the EU.

Economically the effects are similar. However, the GATT (General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs) makes a rather arbitrary (from an economic and pricing perspective in the modern global economy) distinction between direct taxes (i.e., the US income tax) and indirect taxes (i.e., the EU VAT tax) - reductions in direct taxes for exports are a prohibited subsidy; reductions in indirect taxes for exports are NOT a prohibited subsidy.


History

The DISC - The Domestic International Sales Corporation was created in 1971. This legislation permitted U.S. exporters to exempt a portion of their profits by routing them through a domestic subsidiary - the DISC. The exporter would assign export income to the DISC and the DISC would generally be exempt from tax on this export income. Income eligible for this exemption was generally income from the export of property with 50% U.S. content. The exclusion was the greatest of 4% of gross qualifying sales receipts, 50% of qualifying profits, or an allocation based on arm's length pricing. This regime provided for potentially indefinite deferral of US taxation these profits - until they were paid out as dividends to their owners.

A complaint was lodged against the DISC regime in 1972 and the DISC was ultimately and finally found to be a prohibited trade subsidy under GATT in 1981.

In 1984, Congress added an interest charge to the tax deferral provided by DISCs under which shareholders of the DISC are charged interest on income tax that would have been paid on the income retained by the DISC (i.e., not paid out as dividends to the DISC shareholders). These interest-charge (IC-DISCs) do comply with the 1981 GATT ruling and continue to be available to U.S. exporters.

The FSC - After the DISC was found to be illegal, Congress enacted the foreign sales corporation (FSC) in 1984, replacing the domestic subsidiary with a foreign subsidiary and again providing for significant deferral of U.S. income tax on income from exports.

This regime stood until the EU (joined by Canada and Japan among others) lodged a complaint against it in 1997 with the World Trade Organization (WTO). Commentators have suggested that his delayed complaint may have been the result of a number of factors, including but not limited to US victories with the WTO relating to the EU's import regime relating to bananas and hormone-treated beef and/or the expansion of the FSC regime to include US software exporters.

In any event, the WTO found the FSC regime to also be a prohibited export subsidy in 1999. The U.S. appealed the ruling, but it was upheld in 2000. The FSC was repealed by Congress in November 2000, with benefits phased-out and certain binding transactions grandfathered in.

The ETI - The same act that repealed the FSC regime enacted the extraterritorial income (ETI) regime in 2000. In this regime, a portion of qualifying foreign trade income was simply excluded from US taxation vs. using a tax-exempt subsidiary to exclude roughly the same income. Congress likened this regime to the territorially based tax systems of many other GATT signatories. The ETI regime provided for an exclusion from taxable income of the greatest of the following amounts:

- 30% of foreign sale and leasing income - income attributable to foreign sales and distribution activities such as solicitation of sales, negotiation, advertising, and transportation and income from renting qualified property outside the U.S.
-1.2% of foreign trading gross receipts - gross receipts from activities performed outside the US with respect to the sale or lease of qualifying property, or
- 15% of foreign trade income - foreign trade gross receipts less COGS, direct foreign expenses relating to the sale or lease, and a share of indirect costs - basically taxable income allocable to qualifying exports.

Almost immediately after enactment, the EU complained to the WTO that the ETI regime constituted a prohibited export subsidy. The WTO agreed with the EU in a 2001 ruling that was upheld on appeal in 2002.

In August 2002, the WTO granted the EU to impose $4 billion in trade sanctions on US exports to the EU. The EU began imposing sanctions in March 2004.

The 2004 Jobs Act, enacted in October 2004, repealed the ETI regime on a phased-in schedule and provides for a qualified production deduction in its stead.

The repeal of the ETI regime is phased in and taxpayer may continue to claim the benefit as follows:

- 80% for 2005
-60% for 2006
-100% for transactions subject to a binding contract in effect on September 17, 2004.

The EU ceased its sanctions effective January 2005, but may re-impose them based on the phase-in and grandfather provisions of both the FSC and the ETI regimes.

The QPD

The qualified production deduction is designed to put manufacturers who were receiving the benefit of the ETI exclusion on roughly the same after-tax financial footing. When fully phased in, the QPD regime will have the effect of reducing the highest tax rate on domestic production activities from 35% to 32%.

Significantly, the QPD differs from prior incentives in that it provides for a reduction in taxable income for production in the U.S. - regardless of where the goods are ultimately sold. The EU has not opposed this regime.

The deduction is a percentage of taxable income from domestic production activity. The applicable percentage is:

Tax Years Percentage
2005 - 2006 3%
2007 - 2009 6%
2010 ff 9%

The deduction is available to C corporations and to owners of S corporations, partnerships, and sole proprietorships.

Businesses may qualify for the deduction if they:

(1) produce, grow, or extract,
(2) in whole or in significant part within the United States,
(3) any tangible personal property or computer software and
(4) derive income from leasing, licensing, or selling such property.

While there is no list of qualifying production activities, the deduction's scope is clearly broader than traditional manufacturing and includes certain software development, mineral production, farming, construction, and engineering and architectural services.

The law includes these limiting provisions:
-The deduction is limited to 50% of the business's W-2 wages for the calendar year that ends with or in the tax year for which the deduction is claimed.
-If the qualified production activity income to which the deduction would apply is more than taxable income, the deduction is limited to the applicable percentage of taxable income.
-The deduction is not available for the sale of food and beverages prepared at retail establishments.

The deduction applies for alternative minimum tax as well as for regular tax.

Additional Planning for Closely-Held Exporters as a Result of the Repeal of ETI

Businesses that take the ETI exclusion are not permitted to simultaneously use an IC-DISC to shelter additional income. There does not appear to be any such restriction with regard to the QPD.

In other words, U.S. businesses with significant U.S. production and export activity can benefit from both the QPD and the IC-DISC. This works best for closely-held exporters where business income is taxed at federal rates of up to 35% but dividends from the IC-DISC would only be taxed at 15% - a permanent tax savings of at least 20%. The 15% federal tax rate on qualified dividends is scheduled to end after 2008. Congress continues to discuss extending or making permanent this provision and, at least in the interim, significant tax savings are available.

For more information on this strategy and an example of the potential tax savings, see our 2005 International Tax Newsletter at www.ddfky.com, or feel free to contact the authors at lmckee@ddfky.com or jshah@ddfky.com.


Disclaimer: The comments provided herein are general in nature. You should consult your tax advisor regarding your specific situation before taking any action. No part of these comments may be used to avoid tax penalties or to support the promotion or marketing of any tax transactions.

top


Lexmark Introduces New Printer Lines

Lexmark International today unveiled a new family of color laser printers aimed to the company's business customers.

The C770 family includes the C770n and C772n color laser printers, as well as the X772e color multi-function printer, which offers copy, scan and fax functions. The new products print up to 25 pages a minute in color and monochrome. Color lasers are a strong growth segment in the printing industry. While the laser market as a whole grew 22 percent in units sold in 2004-05, according to market analyst IDC, color lasers grew 47 percent.
Lexmark has focused on the segment extensively in the past year. The company introduced the C520 line of color lasers late last year, offering speeds of up to 20 pages a minute in color and monochrome. In May, the company also introduced the C500n, a lower-priced model aimed at small and medium businesses.

The C770n, introduced today, has an estimated street price of $999. The C772n, which offers a higher-yield toner cartridge, room for more paper and upgrade potential, has suggested price of $1,499. The X772e has a suggested price of $4,499. The C770n and C772n are available now, and the X772e will debut in late September.

The Herald-Leader

top


Expeditors Newsflash

U.S.-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement Implemented

President Bush issued a proclamation on July 27, 2006 to implement the United
States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement (FTA), effective August 1, 2006.

"I am pleased that the President has issued a proclamation to implement the
U.S.-Bahrain FTA as of August 1, 2006," U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) Susan
C. Schwab stated in a press release on Thursday. "We have worked closely and
intensively with the Government of Bahrain to ensure that the obligations and
responsibilities of each party under the agreement have been met."

"Soon U.S. farmers, manufacturers and service providers will enjoy new
opportunities in this growing market," Schwab added, noting that the Bush
Administration considers the agreement to be an important step in advancing
the establishment of a Middle East Free Trade Area (MEFTA) by 2013.

Negotiations on the U.S.-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement began in January 2004
and concluded in May of that year. Implementing legislation for the agreement
passed the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate in December 2005 and
was signed by President Bush in January 2006.

Additional information on the agreement can be accessed on the USTR's "Bahrain
FTA" web page at:
http://www.ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Bahrain_FTA/Section_Index.html


Expeditors Newsflash

Recent Customs Quota Book Transmittals

The Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (Customs) publishes directives
related to absolute and tariff-rate quotas for both textile and non-textile
commodities on the agency's "Quota Book Transmittals (QBTs)" web page.
Customs' "QBT" page provides notices of quota opening and closing dates, lists
quota levels assigned for given products and quota periods and provides
special instructions for the processing of quota entries and on other
quota-related issues.

Recent QBT directives include the following:
- QBT-06-534 - 07/28/2006 - (Uruguay Round/GATT Quota on Cotton) Cotton 52
ausn 6
- QBT-06-535 - 07/28/2006 - (Uruguay Round/GATT Quota on Cotton) Cotton 52
ausn 7
- QBT-06-536 - 07/28/2006 - (Uruguay Round/GATT Quota on Cotton) Cotton 52
ausn 8
- QBT-06-023 - 07/31/2006 - Bahrain FTA 2006 Textile TPL
- QBT-06-024 - 07/31/2006 - Bahrain FTA Ensembles
- QBT-06-537 - 07/31/2006 - Bahrain FTA 2006 Agricultural TRQs

Customs' "Quota Book Transmittals (QBTs)" web page can be accessed on-line at:
http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/textiles_and_quotas/qbts/.

Customs' pamphlet "Import Quotas" can be accessed on the agency's Trade
Publications page at:
http://www.customs.ustreas.gov/xp/cgov/toolbox/publications/trade/.



Expeditors Newsflash, (206) 674-3400, expeditors.newsflash@expeditors.com

 

top

top
© 2006


Creating a World of Opportunities for Kentucky Business

webRight Marketing and Design
Search Marketing - webRight