Chinese
commercial terminology traditionally views international “trading
rights” as distinctly separate from “distribution rights.”
“Trading rights” are generally understood to include the right
to import or export goods manufactured by third parties into
or out of China. In acceding to the WTO, China committed to
grant all enterprises international trading rights after December
11, 2004. “Distribution rights” are generally understood to
include the right to engage in the internal sale, offering
for sale, purchase, distribution or use of those goods that
have been imported into China. Prior to the FICP Regulations,
in order for foreign companies to distribute goods within China,
they had to establish joint ventures with a Chinese partner.
The FICP Regulations abolish this requirement, and introduce
a new type of foreign-invested enterprise which will be permitted
to distribute products within China. Taken together, the trading
rights coupled with the “distribution rights” granted by the
FICP Regulations will allow foreign companies unprecedented
access to the Chinese market.
The
FICP Regulations also appear to allow wholly foreign-owned
enterprises (“WFOEs”) to distribute their goods throughout
China. Subject to certain restrictions concerning specific
commodities, the new rules eliminate many of the limitations
that were imposed in the prior “experimental” rules. According
to the Guideline Catalogue for Foreign Investment Industries
published by the State Council, the real surprise under the
new procedures is that there will no longer be the burdensome
investment capital requirements for foreign investors. Foreign
investors will, however, need to comply with the capital requirements
under existing laws that are applicable to all domestic Chinese
companies.
The
FICP Regulations expand the business scope of wholesale, retail
and franchise industries within China. For example, the FICP
Regulations allow retail entities established under the new
regulations to sell products for its own account, import products
for the enterprise’s own sales, purchase domestic products
for export, and perform related services. Similarly, the FICP
Regulations permit wholesale enterprises to sell products on
a wholesale basis, act as a sales agent (excluding auction
services), import and export products, and other related services.
The Regulations also grant the right to open and operate franchises,
with no apparent geographic, quantitative or equity restrictions.
However, the implementing regulations for franchising have
not yet been released. The application process for obtaining
FICP status has been streamlined, and is anticipated as being
fairly straightforward. The FICP Regulations still require
project approval, feasibility study approval and enterprise
establishment approval, but all are combined into one step
instead of two as before.
While
it appears as though the FICP Regulations will undoubtedly
allow foreign companies much greater access to China’s domestic
market, it should be noted that certain significant restrictions
still exist. For example, entities established under the FICP
Regulations may not engage in sales via television, telephone,
mail, or the Internet. There are also several general geographic
restrictions designed to manage the influx of large-scale U.S.
and European retailers. Among these are significant restrictions
on the size of foreign distribution outlets that will be permitted,
and the requirement that any new retail store conform to the
urban and commercial development plan of the local government.
While
both the FTL Amendments and the FICP Regulations represent
significant steps forward in the liberalization of China’s
import and distribution sectors, there are several issues that
remain open. The regulations governing the establishment of
franchise operations have yet to be released and since many
foreign retailers operate on a franchise model, they must await
the passage of these franchising rules. More importantly, the
FICP Regulations are new and, as with any new rules in China,
a certain amount of time, further interpretation, as well as
discussion with Chinese authorities is necessary to determine
how they will be applied in practice. It remains to be seen,
therefore, how certain discretionary rules included in the
Regulations are actually applied in practice.
If
you have any questions about investing in China, or about China’s
trading or distribution rules, please contact Stephen J. Petras,
Jr., a partner with Baker & Hostetler LLP, Cleveland, at spetras@bakerlaw.com.