Volume 16 Number 1 January 2005
Back to TradeView

 

International Trade News

 

Textile Quotas Eliminated Among WTO Countries
For more than three decades, countries like the United States and many members of the European Union have been using quotas to limit imports of textiles and apparel. These limit in detail the number of T-shirts, blouses and other items that may be imported from a particular country.

That all changed on January 1 when all WTO countries agreed to end the use of import quotas on goods in the textile and clothing sector. Despite dropping these quotas, countries will still be allowed to collect tariffs on such imports, although international trade rules limit the level of the tariffs. Countries will also be allowed to impose safeguard quotas if imports soar in particular categories of garments or textiles from China.

Source: www.joc.com

 


 

U.S. – Australia Free Trade Agreement Takes Effect on Schedule
The U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement took effect on January 1, 2005. The U.S. currently enjoys a $9.1 billion trade surplus with Australia. The agreement will eliminate 99% of Australian tariffs on U.S.-manufactured goods as soon as the pact takes effect. By 2015, all trade in goods will become duty-free. The agreement was signed after Australia finally agreed to changes in intellectual property rules involving pharmaceutical patents, and copyright piracy in connection with the reproduction of movies. The U.S. believes the accord could lead to an increase of $2 billion a year in exports of manufactured goods.

Source: www.joc.com

 


 

U.S. Makes Progress Toward Free Trade Agreements with Middle East
In 2005, Congress is expected to approve the free trade agreement (FTA) signed by the U.S and Bahrain last September. The U.S. has signed similar agreements with Jordan and Morocco. In mid-February, the U.S. will begin to negotiate FTAs with the United Arab Emirates and Oman. In addition, a first step has been made toward a future FTA with Egypt through the creation of Qualified Industrial Zones from which certain goods may be imported into the U.S. duty-free. The Bush administration hopes to create a comprehensive Middle East Free Trade Area by 2013, part of a long-term strategy to bring peace and prosperity to the region.

Source: www.joc.com

 


 

Asia Free Trade Pacts Progress
Japan and ministers from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) agreed to open negotiations on a free trade pact in April 2005, targeting an implementation date of 2012 with the association's more developed countries - Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, the Philippines, Indonesia and Brunei.

ASEAN and China have already been working on a deal that could result in the world's biggest free trade zone of nearly two billion people with a combined gross domestic product of $2 trillion by 2010.

Source: www.xporta.com

 


 

Cambodia Joins WTO
Cambodia's legislature voted August 31st to approve the nation's entry into the World Trade Organization, a step forced by new rules for international textile and apparel trade that could otherwise have smothered the country's garment industry. Four-fifths of Cambodia's exports are garments, and the rules for the international garment trade could have shut down much of these exports if Cambodia had not joined the trade group.

Cambodia is joining the WTO even though it lacks many laws usually regarded as the underpinnings of a modern economy, like bankruptcy and incorporation statutes. But business leaders have welcomed Cambodia's entry as helping guide the country to the creation of a modern legal framework for commerce.

Cambodia's ratification increases the pressure on Vietnam in particular to join the WTO. Vietnam could otherwise risk losing much of its garment industry to countries that are members, notably China.

Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

 


 

Japan Signs FTA with Mexico
Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi signed a free trade agreement (FTA) with Mexico on September 17th, during a meeting with Mexico President Vicente Fox.

Japan and Mexico reached accord on the FTA in March following a 16-month negotiation. The Japanese parliament must give its final approval for the agreement to enter into force. The FTA is expected to go into effect in April 2005.

This is the second FTA that Japan has signed; the first was with Singapore. Mexico has entered into 11 FTAs with a total of 42 countries, including the European Union. Japan plans to gain greater access to the U.S. market through the NAFTA partner.

Source: www.mofa.go.jp/region/latin/mexico/agreement/joint.html

 


 

Central America Free Trade Agreement Update
In May 2004, the Bush administration signed the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) with Costs Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua, and inserted the Dominican Republic into the pact in August. A vote on the agreement is expected before August 2005.

In October, the Dominican Republic signed a law that included a 25% tax on drinks made with corn-based sweeteners, a major U.S. export. Because the provision is in violation of CAFTA, some critics would like to see the Dominican Republic removed from CAFTA if the tax is not repealed.

Source: www.joc.com

 


 

WTO Doha Round Back on Track
The World Trade Organization's 147 member states formally agreed a framework that lays down the guidelines for its Doha Round, which has been in trouble since the collapse of talks over a year ago in Cancun, Mexico. Rich and poor nations struck a historic deal to slash billions of dollars in farm subsidies, create more open industrial markets, and revive stalled world trade talks that could boost global growth.

Rich nations welcomed the deal, which commits them to a plan to cut back on the huge subsidies they lavish on farmers and give developed nations better access to world markets. Agreement in the sensitive field of agriculture opened the way for a similar accord in industrial goods trade and development issues, areas in which the WTO sought a framework accord to serve as a basis for future more detailed negotiations under the Doha Round.

The World Bank says the round could help lift more than half a billion people out of poverty through increased trade, and boosting growth by injecting billions of dollars into the world economy. The agreement makes clear that the poorest countries will not be forced to contribute to market opening in any area, including services.

For more details on the Doha Round, please visit:
www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dda_e/draft_text_gc_dg_31july04_e.htm.

 


 

Poll Lists Favorite Places for Multinationals to Invest
The latest Foreign Direct Investment Confidence Index, prepared annually by A.T. Kearney Inc., shows that China and India run neck-and-neck as the favorite places for multinationals to invest overseas. Asked to identify the kinds of activities that will be sent to China and India, respondents said China leads for manufacturing and assembly, but India leads for IT, business processing, and R&D investments. Investors favored China over India for its market size, access to export markets, government incentives, favorable cost structure, infrastructure and macroeconomic climate. The same investors favored India for its highly educated work force, management talent, rule of law, transparency, cultural affinity and regulatory environment.

Source: www.joc.com

 


 

World Bank Compares Business Regulations in 145 Countries
The World Bank has published a report entitled "Removing Obstacles to Growth" and features the Top 10 Reformer Countries and the Top 20 Economies for Doing Business. The series is designed to investigate the scope and manner of regulations that enhance or constrain business activity.

Quantitative indicators on business regulations and their enforcement can be compared, over a period of time, across 145 countries. Similar to the 2004 report, indicators cover topics such as starting a business, hiring and firing workers, enforcing contracts, obtaining credit, and closing a business. The 2005 edition has added two additional topics: registering property and protecting investors.

A copy of the report may be purchased at
http://publications.worldbank.org/ecommerce/catalog/product?item_id=1384970.

 


 

China Workers' Per Capita Annual Salary on the Rise
China’s State Statistics Bureau indicated that the per capita annual salary of the full-time workers in China was USD 1,699 (RMB 14040) in 2003, USD 1,503 (RMB 12422) in 2002, and USD 1,315 (RMB 10870) in 2001.

According to the Bureau, the Ministry of Labor and Social Security released a survey indicating that in 2003, the annual average monthly work days and hours of the full-time employees in cities and towns were 20.92 days and 167.4 hours respectively. The converted daily and hourly salary based on this fact were USD 6.76 (RMB 55.93) and USD 0.85 (RMB 6.99) respectively.

Source: Beijing Daily

 


 

USDA Announces Final Regulations on Wood Packaging Materials
During the past 15 years, governments have focused on preventing the introduction of pests in logs and wood packaging materials. The U.S. has been specifically concerned about the introduction of the pine shoot beetle and the Asian long-horned beetle.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has now published its final regulations on this subject in the Federal Register. These new regulations will come into full force on September 16, 2005, and will affect all imports into the United States. The regulations apply to all types of wood packaging materials including pallets, crates, boxes, skids and wood used to support, block or brace cargo.

The new regulations do not cover:

  • Manufactured wood materials such as plywood and particleboard. These products undergo sufficient heat in their manufacturing process to eliminate parasites.
  • Wood less than six millimeters (0.24 inches) thick in any dimension. This is too thin to carry insects.

Key points:

  • Regulations apply to all solid wood over six millimeters in any dimension, not processed wood such as particleboard or plywood.
  • Regulated packaging materials should be either heat treated or fumigated with methyl bromide according to the approved methods in the final regulations.
  • Materials so treated must be marked according to the approved methods in the final regulations.
  • Customs inspectors may order the immediate re-export of regulated wood packaging material which does not have the required marking.

Because of the risk of re-exportation, importers may wish to implement, in either their contracts or purchase orders, a clause requiring that all wood packaging conform to the new U.S. standard, and a statement that the vendor agrees to bear any cost of re-export or other costs incurred by the importer as a result of their having shipped non-conforming packaging.

Source: www.i-b-t.net

 


 

Countries Retaliate Against U.S. Byrd Amendment
The European Union (EU) and Japan announced on November 10 that they are moving to impose retaliatory tariffs against more than $135 million of U.S. exports. They plan to take the action in response to U.S. inaction to repeal the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA, also known as the Byrd Amendment).

Under the CDSOA all antidumping (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD) are distributed to the complainants, rather than being returned to the treasury. U.S. payouts totaled $231 million in 2001, $330 million in 2002 and $190 million in 2003.

The European Union, Japan, Canada, Brazil, India, Mexico, Chile and South Korea argued successfully at the WTO that those payments, to U.S. ball bearing, steel, candle, pasta, seafood and other companies, amounted to an illegal subsidy. They had asked for sanctions for the same amount as U.S. firms receive, but arbitrators set the figure at 72 percent.

Japan has listed 371 U.S. exports to Japan, worth $1.18 billion, from which Japan will select the sanction targets. Almost two-thirds of the products on the list are steel and ball bearings, as well as textiles and machinery. The European Union has established a list of items on which it will apply retaliatory duty in HS Chapters 07, 48, 61, 62, 63, 64, 84, 87, 90, 94 and 96.

Source: www.xporta.com and www.wto.org/english/news_e/news_e.htm

 


 

EU Lifts U.S. Export Sanctions after U.S. Exporter Tax Break is Repealed
The European Union announced October 28th it would lift sanctions on U.S. goods in January after Congress repealed $5 billion Extraterritorial Income (ETI) program that the World Trade Organization had ruled an illegal export subsidy. The ETI is the successor to the Foreign Sales Corporation (FSC) program, also ruled illegal.

The penalties on U.S. imports, which began in March at 5% of the value of the goods, and rose to 12% in October, was removed on January 1, when the U.S. legislation took effect.

"This has been the biggest of the trans-atlantic disputes that we have experienced in the last five decades," EU Trade Commissioner Pascal Lamy said. "We're lifting the sanctions, and that is the essential part of the agreement, but we still have a few doubts about a small part of the system." The Europeans asked for talks with the U.S. to question why some of the biggest American corporations should be given a three-year grace period or transition before the original tax cut was ended.

Affected taxpayers can still claim 100 percent of their FSC/ETI tax benefits for 2004; 80 percent for 2005; and 60 percent for 2006. After 2006, the repeal will be complete. In general, full FSC/ETI tax benefits will still be available for income from binding contracts that were in effect as of September 17, 2003.

In place of the former ETI and FSC regimes is The American Jobs Creation Act, which makes major changes in the federal income tax rules applicable to income earned from foreign activities. Most importantly, the foreign tax credit provisions have been liberalized and streamlined, and a temporary 85-percent-dividends-received deduction has been installed to encourage U.S. companies to bring home cash now held in controlled foreign corporations. There are many other new rules that will be important for various business taxpayers, depending on their specific circumstances.

Source: www.xporta.com & Mountjoy & Bressler, LLC

 


 

Anti-Bribery Accord Reviewed after Five Years
The U.S. Commerce Department released a report called "Addressing the Challenges of International Bribery and Fair Competition 2004". The report assesses the current status and effectiveness of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, since its entry into force five years ago.

All 35 signatories to the convention, including the United States, adopted legislation that criminalizes the bribery of foreign public offices by persons within their jurisdiction. The convention was signed in December, 1997 and entered into force in February 1999. It includes all 30 OECD member countries as well as non-member countries Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, and Slovenia.

The study found uneven enforcement of the anti-corruption convention among the signatories. For example, only the U.S., South Korea, and Sweden have won convictions for the bribery of a foreign public official, although Canada, France, Italy, and Norway have also initiated investigations or other legal proceedings. The other signatories "have been slow to apply enforcement resources to address transnational bribery," the report noted.

Commerce cited U.S. government estimates that between May 1, 2003, and April 30, 2004, the competition for 47 contracts worth $18 billion may have been affected by bribery by foreign firms of foreign officials. The report noted that, although this represents an increase over last year's report of 40 contracts, the value of the contracts dropped from $23 billion to $18 billion. U.S. firms are known to have lost at least eight of the contracts, worth $3 billion, the report said.

Source: www.tcc.mac.doc.gov/pdf/2004bribery.pdf

 


 

BIS Announces Revisions To The Export Administration Regulations
The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued a proposed rule expanding the knowledge standard and increasing the number of red flags that exporters should check before shipping. At the same time, the agency will provide a safe harbor from liability.

Reasonable Person Standard
The new rule would adopt an objective reasonable person standard. It does not matter that a person actually knew of a violation. If the person should have known, then that is sufficient to find him or her liable. Currently it needs to show that the person, with high probability, knew or should have known based on the existing circumstances. The BIS wants to replace high probability with more likely than not.

New Red Flags

The BIS will also be increasing the number of red flags found in Part 732, Supplement 3 of the EAR from 12 to 23. Most importers check the twelve red flags when they screen shipments, but often those twelve red flags are completely irrelevant to the type of transaction or exporter. The proposed rule also provides needed guidance of what companies and individuals should do upon finding a red flag.

Here are the proposed red flags:

    1. The customer or purchasing agent is vague, evasive, or inconsistent in providing information about the end-use of a product.
    2. The product's capabilities do not fit the buyer's line of business or level of technical sophistication. For example, a customer places an order for several advanced lasers from a facility with no use for such equipment in its manufacturing processes.
    3. A request for equipment configuration is incompatible with the stated ultimate destination (e.g., 120 volts for a country with 220 volts).
    4. The product ordered is incompatible with the technical level of the country to which the product is being shipped. For example, semiconductor manufacturing equipment would be of little use in a country without an electronics industry.
    5. The customer has little background in the relevant business. For example, financial information is unavailable from ordinary commercial sources and the customer's corporate principal is unknown.
    6. The customer is willing to pay cash for an expensive item when the normal practice in this business would involve financing.
    7. The customer is unfamiliar with the product's performance characteristics, but still wants the product.
    8. Installation, testing, training, or maintenance services are declined by the customer, even though these services are included in the sales price or ordinarily requested for the item involved.
    9. Terms of delivery, such as date, location, and consignee, are vague or unexpectedly changed, or delivery is planned for an out-of-the-way destination.
    10. The address of the ultimate consignee, as listed on the airway bill or bill of lading, indicates that it is in a free trade zone.
    11. The ultimate consignee, as listed on the airway bill or bill of lading, is a freight forwarding firm, a trading company, a shipping company or a bank, unless it is apparent that the ultimate consignee is also the end-user or the end-user is otherwise identified on the airway bill or bill of lading.
    12. The shipping route is abnormal for the product and destination.
    13. Packaging is inconsistent with the stated method of shipment or destination.
    14. When questioned, the buyer is evasive or unclear about whether the purchased product is for domestic use, export or re-export.
    15. The customer uses an address that is inconsistent with standard business practices in the area (e.g., a P.O. Box address where street addresses are commonly used).
    16. The customer does not have facilities that are appropriate for the items ordered or end-use stated.
    17. The customer's order is for parts known to be inappropriate or for which the customer appears to have no legitimate need (e.g., there is no indication of prior authorized shipment of system for which the parts are sought).
    18. The customer is known to have or is suspected of having dealings with embargoed countries.
    19. The transaction involves a party on the Unverified List published by BIS in the Federal Register.
    20. The product into which the exported item is to be incorporated bears unique designs or marks that indicate an embargoed destination or one other than the customer has claimed.
    21. The customer gives different spellings of its name for different shipments, which can suggest that the customer is disguising its identity and/or the nature and extent of its procurement activities.
    22. The requested terms of sale, such as product specification and calibration, suggest a destination or end-use other than what is claimed (e.g., equipment that is calibrated for a specific altitude that differs from the altitude of the claimed destination).
    23. The customer provides information or documentation related to the transaction that you suspect is false, or requests that you provide documentation that you suspect is false.

    Safe Harbor
    Along with these, BIS is proposing to create a safe harbor from liability caused by the expanded knowledge standard. The safe harbor will be found in a new section of the EAR: 764.7. If you actually knew of a violation, you don't get the safe harbor. To qualify for safe harbor, exporters must (1) classify the item and obtained any required export license, (2) screen the transaction against the various bad persons lists, and (3) follow the new red flags procedures, including filing a report with the BIS.

The BIS will also allow exporters to obtain an official evaluation of their efforts to comply with red flags that companies have identified as relevant to specific shipments. BIS expects to respond to each report within 45 days.

For more information about these new rules see the Federal Register for October 13, 2004 under ‘Proposed Rule’s and ‘Department of Commerce.’ The full text is downloadable from www.regulations.gov.

Source: www.i-b-t.net & www.joc.com

 


Kentucky World Trade Center
© Copyright 2005

webRight marketing and Design
Search Marketing - webRight